[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Doc: LM: Reformat ly code. (issue1056041)
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: Doc: LM: Reformat ly code. (issue1056041) |
Date: |
Wed, 5 May 2010 18:04:42 -0600 |
On 5/5/10 12:01 PM, "Graham Percival" <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:57 AM, <address@hidden> wrote:
>> I think it's an improvement. I've made specific comments inline.
>
> sweet mao... you're adding barline checks to every single example?!
>
> cis4 ees fisis, aeses |
>
> I definitely do **not** like this.
> cis4 ees fisis, aeses
> is just fine to read. If there's only one bar of simple music on a
> line, surely we don't need a barline check!
For the Learning Manual, I would dispense with *all* final barline checks.
Carl
Re: Doc: LM: Reformat ly code. (issue1056041), percival . music . ca, 2010/05/06
Re: Doc: LM: Reformat ly code. (issue1056041), percival . music . ca, 2010/05/06
Re: Doc: LM: Reformat ly code. (issue1056041), tdanielsmusic, 2010/05/06
Re: Doc: LM: Reformat ly code. (issue1056041), percival . music . ca, 2010/05/07