Re: Doc: LM: Reformat ly code. (issue1056041)

[Graham Percival]

On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 06:04:42PM -0600, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> 
> On 5/5/10 12:01 PM, "Graham Percival" <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:57 AM,  <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> I think it's an improvement.  I've made specific comments inline.
> > 
> > sweet mao... you're adding barline checks to every single example?!
> > 
> >   cis4 ees fisis, aeses |
> 
> For the Learning Manual, I would dispense with *all* final barline checks.

I wouldn't go that far.  Compare:
  r8 | r4. r4 c8 | a'([ g)] f f([ e)] d | e([ d)] c bes' |
with
  r8 | r4. r4 c8 | a'([ g)] f f([ e)] d | e([ d)] c bes'

I'd rather have the first type; the final barline check just
reassures you that everything matches up.

Cheers,
- Graham