[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: broken links for "next section in reading order"
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: broken links for "next section in reading order" |
Date: |
Tue, 25 May 2010 00:21:25 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 07:23:07AM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
> Trevor Daniels wrote:
> > Graham Percival wrote:
> >>> @node Setting @code{X-offset} and @code{Y-offset} ...
> >>
> >> !!! wow, I didn't think this was allowed.
> >
> > I can't remember the details, but I wrote this section in
> > Sept 2008 and I think I just tried it and found it worked.
> > Was this around the time you took your sabbatical from LP?
> > Maybe that's why you didn't notice?
>
> I think Graham meant "I didn't think this was possible".
Yes... although I don't read Trevor's email as suggesting that he
thought that I thought it was not possible.
(I _think_ I wrote that correctly...)
Anyway, what does the texinfo manual say about @-commands in node
names? Could you look this up, James?
(I'm not proposing that we change this immediately, since it seems
to work... although we haven't checked that it works in all output
formats... but it would be nice to know for a general case, and
possibly change it in the future)
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", (continued)
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", James Lowe, 2010/05/21
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Graham Percival, 2010/05/21
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Mark Polesky, 2010/05/21
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Graham Percival, 2010/05/23
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Trevor Daniels, 2010/05/24
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Mark Polesky, 2010/05/24
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order",
Graham Percival <=
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", James Lowe, 2010/05/26
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", Graham Percival, 2010/05/29
- Re: broken links for "next section in reading order", James Lowe, 2010/05/31