[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ambitus: special handling of small ambits' lines (issue4609041)
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: ambitus: special handling of small ambits' lines (issue4609041) |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Jun 2011 15:51:52 +0200 |
2011/6/13 <address@hidden>:
> Thanks - much clearer!
>
> Two points:
>
> a) It would be better to honour the value of 'gap if this
> is set by the user, rather than change a specifically
> requested gap value.
My rationale is that it wouldn't make sense to set a big gap and
really want to have it applied to all ambituses. Consider the
following:
\new Staff \with { \consists Ambitus_engraver } {
\override Staff.AmbitusLine #'gap = #0.7
c' g'
}
\new Staff \with { \consists Ambitus_engraver } {
\override Staff.AmbitusLine #'gap = #0.7
c' a'
}
\new Staff \with { \consists Ambitus_engraver } {
\override Staff.AmbitusLine #'gap = #0.7
c' b'
}
\new Staff \with { \consists Ambitus_engraver } {
\override Staff.AmbitusLine #'gap = #0.7
c' c''
}
\new Staff \with { \consists Ambitus_engraver } {
\override Staff.AmbitusLine #'gap = #0.7
c' e''
}
\new Staff \with { \consists Ambitus_engraver } {
\override Staff.AmbitusLine #'gap = #0.7
a a''
}
While gap=0.7 works fine for big ambituses (one can easily imagine
that a user may wish such a value), the ambitus of sixth looks
ridiculous without any line inside. I suppose that if someone would
like that "look", he would probably switch the line off entirely.
And for small gap the effect is almost unnoticeable.
> b) I don't understand why quanting is desired. An ambitus
> doesn't align with anything. What is your reason?
I thought that it's best if ambitus line eihter ends precisely inside
staff line, or protrudes from it distinctly. In other words, i judged
that
\new Staff \with { \consists "Ambitus_engraver" }
{ \override Staff.AmbitusLine #'gap = #0.3 c' b' }
doesn't look nice.
Ofc i'm aware that this is perhaps as nitpicky as it can go :D
Thanks,
Janek
- ambitus: special handling of small ambits' lines (issue4609041), lemniskata . bernoullego, 2011/06/12
- Re: ambitus: special handling of small ambits' lines (issue4609041), tdanielsmusic, 2011/06/13
- Re: ambitus: special handling of small ambits' lines (issue4609041), lemniskata . bernoullego, 2011/06/13
- Re: ambitus: special handling of small ambits' lines (issue4609041), tdanielsmusic, 2011/06/13
- Re: ambitus: special handling of small ambits' lines (issue4609041),
Janek Warchoł <=
- Re: ambitus: special handling of small ambits' lines (issue4609041), lemniskata . bernoullego, 2011/06/15
- Re: ambitus: special handling of small ambits' lines (issue4609041), karin . hoethker, 2011/06/16
- Re: ambitus: special handling of small ambits' lines (issue4609041), Janek Warchoł, 2011/06/21
- Re: ambitus: special handling of small ambits' lines (issue4609041), mtsolo, 2011/06/17
- Re: ambitus: special handling of small ambits' lines (issue4609041), lemniskata . bernoullego, 2011/06/21