[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Labelling of patches
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Labelling of patches |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Dec 2011 09:31:53 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 04:15:43PM +0000, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> On Dec 17, 2011, at 6:54 AM, "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > On the tracker, we use labels to categorise issues. Is there any reason we
> > shouldn't use a specific label just for patches ("Patch")? This will make
> > it clearer to the Bug Squad how to verify - those labelled patch are
> > verified with a commitish, those without by checking the result.
>
> What do you consider a "patch"? Your terminology is not clear to me.
Dunno about Phil, but I'd define it as "an issue which has no Tiny
example".
Cheers,
- Graham