|
From: | Phil Holmes |
Subject: | Re: Labelling of patches |
Date: | Sat, 17 Dec 2011 18:58:06 -0000 |
To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> Cc: "Devel" <address@hidden> Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2011 4:15 PM Subject: Re: Labelling of patches
On Dec 17, 2011, at 6:54 AM, "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> wrote:On the tracker, we use labels to categorise issues. Is there any reason we shouldn't use a specific label just for patches ("Patch")? This will make it clearer to the Bug Squad how to verify - those labelled patch are verified with a commitish, those without by checking the result.What do you consider a "patch"? Your terminology is not clear to me. Carl
I would be happy with "an issue which has been raised by pushing a patch to Rietveld with git-cl"; an alternative would be an issue where the only simple way to verify is to check the commitish has been pushed - but for simplicity would go with the first.
-- Phil Holmes
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |