[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: checking 2240
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: checking 2240 |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:12:06 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:35:17PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> has less potential to go wrong if there is a problem at any time. I
>>> actually don't really understand why we bother with restoring the tree
>>> anyway instead of removing it and doing the next test from a freshly
>>> created
>>> git clone
>>> directory.
>>
>> That loses the regtest baseline, and the whole point is to do a
>> regtest comparison.
>
> Copy it over. Takes few seconds. Something like
>
> cd /usr/tmp/checkoutwithbaseline
> find -name out-baseline -exec cp -a {} /usr/tmp/othercheckout/{}
Or
rsync -av --include="**/out-test-baseline/***" --exclude="*"
checkoutwithbaseline/ othercheckout/
Either case we are talking about a one-liner. And actually, doing
symbolic links should be good enough, and quite faster. In which case
we are again talking find.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: checking 2240, (continued)
- Re: checking 2240, Graham Percival, 2012/01/22
- Re: checking 2240, Janek Warchoł, 2012/01/22
- Re: checking 2240, Janek Warchoł, 2012/01/22
- Re: checking 2240, Graham Percival, 2012/01/22
- Re: checking 2240, Janek Warchoł, 2012/01/22
- Re: checking 2240, Julien Rioux, 2012/01/22
- Re: checking 2240, Janek Warchoł, 2012/01/22
- Re: checking 2240, David Kastrup, 2012/01/24
- Re: checking 2240, Graham Percival, 2012/01/24
- Re: checking 2240, David Kastrup, 2012/01/24
- Re: checking 2240,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: checking 2240, Julien Rioux, 2012/01/24
- Re: checking 2240, Julien Rioux, 2012/01/24
- Re: checking 2240, Graham Percival, 2012/01/24
- Re: checking 2240, Graham Percival, 2012/01/22
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, Graham Percival, 2012/01/21
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, Carl Sorensen, 2012/01/21
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, David Kastrup, 2012/01/21
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, Carl Sorensen, 2012/01/21
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, David Kastrup, 2012/01/21
- Re: 2.16 release candidate 3 imminent, Carl Sorensen, 2012/01/21