[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bad translation merge
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Bad translation merge |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Mar 2012 17:33:46 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 05:27:08PM -0000, Phil Holmes wrote:
> As an improvement to patchy, wouldn't it be better for patchy to
> test for a "stop-patchy" branch and abort if it finds one? Then all
> that would be necessary to suspend the cron job would be to create a
> branch with that name.
No; if there's an emergency, deleting staging is no more effort
than creating a new branch. Now, it could well be worth writing
some test into patchy wherein if there's something suspicious in
the git history for staging, it refuses to test it. Patches
appreciated.
- Graham
- Bad translation merge, David Kastrup, 2012/03/07
- Re: Bad translation merge, David Kastrup, 2012/03/07
- Re: Bad translation merge, David Kastrup, 2012/03/07
- Re: Bad translation merge, David Kastrup, 2012/03/07
- Re: Bad translation merge, Graham Percival, 2012/03/07
- Re: Bad translation merge, David Kastrup, 2012/03/07
- Re: Bad translation merge, Phil Holmes, 2012/03/07
- Re: Bad translation merge,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: Bad translation merge, David Kastrup, 2012/03/07
Re: Bad translation merge, Julien Rioux, 2012/03/07
- Re: Bad translation merge, David Kastrup, 2012/03/07
- Re: Bad translation merge, David Kastrup, 2012/03/07
- Re: Bad translation merge, Jean-Charles Malahieude, 2012/03/07
- Re: Bad translation merge, David Kastrup, 2012/03/07
- Re: Bad translation merge, Jean-Charles Malahieude, 2012/03/07
Re: Bad translation merge, David Kastrup, 2012/03/07
Re: Bad translation merge, Francisco Vila, 2012/03/07