[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LoMuS
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: LoMuS |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Apr 2012 09:13:29 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 10:01:27AM +0200, address@hidden wrote:
> On 28 avr. 2012, at 09:15, Graham Percival wrote:
>
> > So... you *don't* want to set a precedent; you just want a quick
> > answer about this specific case? I guess the general consensus is
> > "go ahead and we'll figure it out later".
> >
>
> I *do* want this to work so well that it sets a solid precedent,
If this is going to set a precedent, then I will say "Do not
submit LilyPond to LoMuS". I'm willing to go along with the
current consensus only if there is the understanding that it does
*not* set a precedent.
> I get the sense in a way that the precedent has already been set - if someone
> sees a cool opportunity (GSoC, LoMuS, whatever), email the list to call dibs
> if dibs must be called, make sure no one is opposed, apply, and do something
> fair with the money if money is to be gotten. In the GSoC case, Janek has
> $500 that he'll be donating to the organization in whatever way he sees fit.
That is not what happened. Google is paying Janek $4500 directly.
Carl is getting $500 for the project, which I guess he will spend
how he sees fit.
- Graham
- LoMuS, address@hidden, 2012/04/27
- Re: LoMuS, Graham Percival, 2012/04/27
- Re: LoMuS, address@hidden, 2012/04/27
- Re: LoMuS, Graham Percival, 2012/04/28
- Re: LoMuS, address@hidden, 2012/04/28
- Re: LoMuS,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: LoMuS, address@hidden, 2012/04/28
- Re: LoMuS, Janek Warchoł, 2012/04/28
- Re: LoMuS, David Kastrup, 2012/04/28
- Re: LoMuS, Janek Warchoł, 2012/04/28
- Re: LoMuS, David Kastrup, 2012/04/28
Re: LoMuS, David Kastrup, 2012/04/27
Re: LoMuS, Łukasz Czerwiński, 2012/04/27
Re: LoMuS, David Kastrup, 2012/04/27
Re: LoMuS, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2012/04/27
Re: LoMuS, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/04/27