[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lilypond-book
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: lilypond-book |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:50:11 +0200 (CEST) |
> > It just seems to me that maintaining \lilypond{} is more trouble
> > than it's worth.
>
> I think it just broke because of the lilypond-book rewrite, and the
> decision to require [fragment] explicitly.
I'll try to fix it in the next few days.
Werner
Re: lilypond-book, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2004/10/11
Re: lilypond-book,
Werner LEMBERG <=