[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: text below staff ouch!
From: |
stk |
Subject: |
Re: text below staff ouch! |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Aug 2005 02:29:39 -0400 (EDT) |
> but now why can't I use word wrap and justify?
I don't usually read this list on the Web, I just read the mail that
the list sends me -- and at this point I have lost track of your
original post to the list.
My mail client is plain-text only (Latin-1). Can you post a message
containing a \markup command *without* word-wrap & justify which gets the
character-order right, and then, secondly, the \markup command *with*
word-wrap & justify, so that I can look at it?
You don't have to use the actual characters in the two \markup examples.
You could just use ascii characters ABC...; it would still show me
the structure of the command you're using.
Thanks for your patience...
-- Tom
**************************************************************
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Aaron Mehl wrote:
> --- address@hidden wrote:
>
> > Aaron Mehl wrote:
> >
> > > but actually for each word the letters are in the
> > > correct order but the words themselves go left to
> > > right instead of right to left.
> >
> > With automatic text reversal, I would expect
> > \markup { ONE TWO THREE }
> > to produce
> > ENO OWT EERHT
>
> exactly
>
> which is what it does once I removed the
> justification and wordwrapping
>
> > But, with a pair of quote-marks added, I would
> > expect
> > \markup { "ONE TWO THREE" }
> > to produce
> > EERHT OWT ENO
> >
>
>
> bravo!
>
> > In the first case, \markup handles 3 arguments, one
> > after the other.
> >
> > In the second case, \markup handles one single
> > argument.
> >
>
> but now why can't I use word wrap and justify?
> maybe I need some escape charactor?
>
> Thanks so far,
> Aaron
>
> > -- Tom
- text below staff ouch!, Aaron Mehl, 2005/08/22
- Re: text below staff ouch!, stk, 2005/08/23
- Re: text below staff ouch!, Mats Bengtsson, 2005/08/24
- Re: text below staff ouch!, Aaron Mehl, 2005/08/24
- Re: text below staff ouch!, Mats Bengtsson, 2005/08/24
- Re: text below staff ouch!, Aaron Mehl, 2005/08/24
- Re: text below staff ouch!, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/08/24