[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Pythonization (was Re: Roadmap to lily code)
From: |
andrea valle |
Subject: |
Pythonization (was Re: Roadmap to lily code) |
Date: |
Thu, 8 Dec 2005 17:21:46 +0100 |
(Could be of some interest so I keep it on the list)
I'm also not sure it's a good idea. If you want python, it would be
better to start afresh with a python version of LilyPond, and move
speed-critical things to C(++). Then, end-result will be more
"pythonic"
And in that case? Could you make a rough estimation? Is it feasible or
is it (as a matter of facts) science fiction?
I imagine that the end result will be slower than the current
GUILE/Scheme combo.
My coding time is precious than machine's working one:)
-a-
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
Andrea Valle
DAMS - Facoltà di Scienze della Formazione
Università degli Studi di Torino
address@hidden
- Re: Roadmap to lily code, (continued)
- Re: Roadmap to lily code, andrea valle, 2005/12/07
- Re: Roadmap to lily code, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/12/07
- Re: Roadmap to lily code, Darius Blasband, 2005/12/08
- Re: Roadmap to lily code, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/12/08
- Re: Roadmap to lily code, Pedro Kröger, 2005/12/08
- Re: Roadmap to lily code, dax2, 2005/12/08
- Re: Roadmap to lily code, Pedro Kröger, 2005/12/08
- Re: Roadmap to lily code, Pedro Kröger, 2005/12/08
- Pythonization (was Re: Roadmap to lily code),
andrea valle <=
- Re: Roadmap to lily code, Christian Ebert, 2005/12/08
- Re: Roadmap to lily code, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/12/06
Re: Roadmap to lily code, Cameron Horsburgh, 2005/12/08
Re: Roadmap to lily code, Art Hixson, 2005/12/31