[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OOolilypond and openoffice 2.1
From: |
Johan Vromans |
Subject: |
Re: OOolilypond and openoffice 2.1 |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Mar 2007 10:24:30 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Samuel Hartmann <address@hidden> writes:
> I think this is a problem with lilypond that may be is not binary
> compatible with your linux distribution. I'm sorry I can not help in this.
OOo supplies its own versions of several libraries, and sets the
LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable to force loading the private
libs. When starting lilypond via OOoLilyPond LD_LIBRARY_PATH is passed
to lilypond as well, and it chokes on the non-compatible version of
the libs.
I posted a simple workaround a couple of days ago.
-- Johan
- Re: -b eps option (was RE: OOolilypond and openoffice 2.1), (continued)
- Re: -b eps option (was RE: OOolilypond and openoffice 2.1), Graham Percival, 2007/03/04
- RE: -b eps option (was RE: OOolilypond and openoffice 2.1), Paul Harouff, 2007/03/04
- Re: -b eps option (was RE: OOolilypond and openoffice 2.1), Mats Bengtsson, 2007/03/05
- Re: -b eps option (was RE: OOolilypond and openoffice 2.1), Paul Harouff, 2007/03/05
- Bug in lilypond-book-preamble (was RE: -b eps option (was RE: OOolilypond and openoffice 2.1)), Paul Harouff, 2007/03/11
- Not a lilypond-book-preamble.ly bug (was RE: -b eps option (was RE: OOolilypond and openoffice 2.1)), Paul Harouff, 2007/03/12
Re: OOolilypond and openoffice 2.1, Samuel Hartmann, 2007/03/06
Re: OOolilypond and openoffice 2.1, Johan Vromans, 2007/03/05
Re: OOolilypond and openoffice 2.1, Samuel Hartmann, 2007/03/06
- Re: OOolilypond and openoffice 2.1,
Johan Vromans <=