[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
## Re: Measure number collision

**From**: |
Joe Neeman |

**Subject**: |
Re: Measure number collision |

**Date**: |
Mon, 23 Apr 2007 22:59:45 +1000 |

**User-agent**: |
KMail/1.9.5 |

On Monday 23 April 2007 14:38, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>* > The solution for this is to use more accurate glyph outlines than*
>* > bounding boxes. I hope to do this at some point, but it is*
>* > non-trivial.*
>
>* Making metafont emit improved data on glyph outlines is quite easy.*
>* The very question is *what* shall it emit...*
>
>* Can you elaborate on this?*
If it could emit a list of line segments that approximates the boundary of the
glyph, that would be _very_ useful.

**Re: Measure number collision**, *(continued)*
**Re: Measure number collision**, *Zoltán Selyem*, `2007/04/22`
**Re: Measure number collision**, *Maximilian Albert*, `2007/04/22`
**Re: Measure number collision**, *Joe Neeman*, `2007/04/22`
**Re: Measure number collision**, *Maximilian Albert*, `2007/04/22`
**Re: Measure number collision**, *Graham Percival*, `2007/04/22`
**Re: Measure number collision**, *Arvid Grøtting*, `2007/04/23`
**Re: Measure number collision**, *Joe Neeman*, `2007/04/23`
**Re: Measure number collision**, *Werner LEMBERG*, `2007/04/23`
**Re: Measure number collision**,
*Joe Neeman* **<=**
**Re: Measure number collision**, *Werner LEMBERG*, `2007/04/23`
**Re: Measure number collision**, *Joe Neeman*, `2007/04/23`
**Re: Measure number collision**, *Han-Wen Nienhuys*, `2007/04/24`
**Re: Measure number collision**, *Werner LEMBERG*, `2007/04/25`