lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: *.mid vs *.midi


From: Reinhold Kainhofer
Subject: Re: *.mid vs *.midi
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 14:39:26 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.9.9

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am Donnerstag, 15. Mai 2008 schrieb Valentin Villenave:

> I tried to have a look at the MIDI 1.0 specs to see if there was any
> "official" extension, but couldn't find one. Windows users seem to
> believe that .mid is more legitimate than .midi, but non-MS users are
> used to non-three-letters extensions.

I suppose that will change, now that MS Office uses four-letter extensions 
(docx, xlsx, etc.).

Cheers,
Reinhold

- -- 
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhold Kainhofer, Vienna University of Technology, Austria
email: address@hidden, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
 * Financial and Actuarial Mathematics, TU Wien, http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/
 * K Desktop Environment, http://www.kde.org, KOrganizer maintainer
 * Chorvereinigung "Jung-Wien", http://www.jung-wien.at/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFILC8DTqjEwhXvPN0RAkJsAKC4V7wZFgYpHH85Kgk594hdwH5x8QCg0Hys
Yk9jyUVcKcuteShcv0cxSwU=
=FOn1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]