[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: collision problem
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: collision problem |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Aug 2008 22:00:44 -0700 |
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 21:23:35 -0700
"Patrick McCarty" <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Tom Cloyd <address@hidden>
> wrote:
> >
> > Oops. Drat. I hate mailing lists which default to reply to sender,
> > rather than reply to list.
>
> Well, I think you would have to direct that concern to the someone at
> GNU, since I believe all GNU mailing lists use the same system.
We just do "reply to all" (or maybe "reply to group"). The
mailist software doesn't send multiple copies to recipients, so
having a specific email address in the header doesn't matter.
Cheers,
- Graham
Re: collision problem, James E. Bailey, 2008/08/18
- collision problem, James E. Bailey, 2008/08/27
- Re: collision problem, Neil Puttock, 2008/08/27
- Re: collision problem, James E. Bailey, 2008/08/28
- Re: collision problem, Graham Percival, 2008/08/28
- Re: collision problem, Mats Bengtsson, 2008/08/28
- Re: collision problem, Graham Percival, 2008/08/28
- Re: collision problem, Kieren MacMillan, 2008/08/28