[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV No Win16 version
From: |
John E. Davis |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV No Win16 version |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Feb 1998 21:20:00 -0500 |
On Sat, 28 Feb 1998 19:53:14 -0500 (EST), Wayne Buttles <address@hidden> said:
>With the compiler I have, the data segment of lynx exceeds 64k and this is
>illegal. It is okay using the flat memory model of win32 or djgpp-386,
>but my borland compilers in Large Win16 mode won't do it. If this is NOT
>an obsticle in other compilers I would be interested in knowing. I never
>really learned to program on a non-flat memory model so I am clueless as
>to how to work around the problem.
Borland compilers support a `huge' memory module that you may
exploit. I imagine that the biggest problem that you will face is
the lack of any sort of console mode by win16.
When I find some time I will port lynx to the MINGW32 compiler
using slang for screen management.
--John
- Re: LYNX-DEV No Win16 version, (continued)
- Re: LYNX-DEV No Win16 version, Benjamin C. W. Sittler, 1998/02/28
- Re: LYNX-DEV No Win16 version, T.E.Dickey, 1998/03/01
- Re: LYNX-DEV No Win16 version, Jason F. McBrayer, 1998/03/01
- Re: LYNX-DEV No Win16 version, T.E.Dickey, 1998/03/01
- Re: LYNX-DEV No Win16 version, Doug Kaufman, 1998/03/01
- Re: LYNX-DEV No Win16 version, Wayne Buttles, 1998/03/01
- Re: LYNX-DEV No Win16 version, T.E.Dickey, 1998/03/02
- Re: LYNX-DEV No Win16 version, Doug Kaufman, 1998/03/02
Re: LYNX-DEV No Win16 version, Jason F. McBrayer, 1998/03/01
Re: LYNX-DEV No Win16 version,
John E. Davis <=
Re: LYNX-DEV No Win16 version, Personal, 1998/03/02
Re: LYNX-DEV No Win16 version, afn06760, 1998/03/16
Re: LYNX-DEV No Win16 version, afn06760, 1998/03/24