[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: mtn:// sync

From: Thomas Moschny
Subject: Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: mtn:// sync
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:16:01 +0100
User-agent: KMail/1.9.9

Derek Scherger wrote:
> Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thomas Moschny wrote:
> >> Ok. I vaguely had in mind that there also was a non-technical reason.
> >
> > I don't know any non-technical reason.
> I believe it's a consequence of the invariant enforced by the database
> that no revision will be stored unless it's parents are also stored.
> This ultimately requires that all ancestry for a revision is in the
> local database before the revision can be stored.

This is clear. But the question was, is there a non-technical reason to not 
sync the branch certs of these ancestor revisions?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]