Re: [Nano-devel] polished git repo

[Chris Allegretta]

On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 2:35 AM, Jordi Mallach <address@hidden> wrote:
> Well, it's the git way. In git there's author, reviewer, committer,
> etc., so a big transition like this is nice to have using a more git-
> like commit message that starts the real-git history.

I assume letting Mike commit these patches himself alleviates much of
the urgency here as it should be carrier over from SVN.

> I'm unsure we need to stitch the switch to git to a nice version
> number. gnulib and git are both implementation details of nano, not
> actual front-end, user oriented bits that are going to be noticed at
> all in nano. In fact, after the gnulib change, nano will be mostly the
> same binary, right? But I really don't care about that. I think it's
> better to take advantage of Mike's work and go ahead with the switch to
> git ASAP, now that we're in a good position to do it.
...
> We probably want to go over the website and repo docs that reference
> SVN before the switch.

Yup, let's plan to do this on 4/1 then, as it is a fun day to make big
changes and will give me some time to get my things updated.