[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 3.0 when?
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: 3.0 when? |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:01:36 -0500 |
On 18-Dec-2007, Michael Goffioul wrote:
| On 12/18/07, Tatsuro MATSUOKA <address@hidden> wrote:
| > Hello Benjamin
| >
| > Benjamin wrote
| > > I would vote for moving edit.m from the forge package to octave core
| > > functions.
| > > Argument is similar to the imread/imwrite topic. Why should I first
| > > install a package to be able to conveniently invoke an editor.
| > >
| > > It would also allow easier use of a packaged editor with the mingw
binaries.
| >
| > That's a good idea!!
| > I also vote for moving edit.m from the forge package to octave core
functions.
|
| Why not also package octave-forge in the mingw binaries?
I think it would be best if the standalone Windows distributions were
essentially the same except for the choice of compiler. Would it be
difficult to make that happen?
jwe
Re: 3.0 when?, John W. Eaton, 2007/12/13
Re: 3.0 when?, Kai Habel, 2007/12/13
Re: 3.0 when?, Benjamin Lindner, 2007/12/18
- Re: 3.0 when?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2007/12/18
- Re: 3.0 when?, Michael Goffioul, 2007/12/18
- Re: 3.0 when?,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: 3.0 when?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2007/12/18
- Re: 3.0 when?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2007/12/19
- Re: 3.0 when?, John W. Eaton, 2007/12/19
- Re: 3.0 when?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2007/12/19
- Re: 3.0 when?, David Bateman, 2007/12/19
- Re: 3.0 when?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2007/12/19
Re: 3.0 when?, John W. Eaton, 2007/12/19