2011/1/10 Michael Goffioul <address@hidden>:
> 2011/1/10 Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <address@hidden>:
>> On 9 January 2011 17:07, logari81 <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> In the attached patch I have modified the positioning of axes in 3D
>>> plots, in order to make it more compatible with ML.
>>
>> Is this "compatibility"? I always thought of compatibility of just
>> making sure code written for Matlab also work in Octave, not so much
>> about superficial cosmetic differences.
> iirc, the funny thing is that I initially put the tick marks on top to be
> compatible with Matlab (around 2007-2008)..
What really worries me is that people might complain about things like
QtOctave not looking exactly like Matab's own interface, hence not
compatible.
Would that happen frequently?
- Jordi G. H.