[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Axes Ticks Positioning in 3D plots (FLTK)
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: Axes Ticks Positioning in 3D plots (FLTK) |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Jan 2011 15:30:59 -0500 |
On 9-Jan-2011, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
| Is this "compatibility"? I always thought of compatibility of just
| making sure code written for Matlab also work in Octave, not so much
| about superficial cosmetic differences.
Exactly. If we are going to start worrying about making Octave look
precisely like Matlab, then I quit.
Let's focus instead on trying to make programs run as best we can.
But even that has limits. For example, there is no way that we should
spend a large amount of time to fix a minor compatibility problem that
only affects a small number of people and that has a simple
workaround.
jwe
- Re: Axes Ticks Positioning in 3D plots (FLTK), (continued)
- Re: Axes Ticks Positioning in 3D plots (FLTK), Ben Abbott, 2011/01/09
- Re: Axes Ticks Positioning in 3D plots (FLTK), Ben Abbott, 2011/01/09
- Re: Axes Ticks Positioning in 3D plots (FLTK), Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2011/01/09
- Re: Axes Ticks Positioning in 3D plots (FLTK), Michael D Godfrey, 2011/01/09
- Re: Axes Ticks Positioning in 3D plots (FLTK), logari81, 2011/01/10
- Re: Axes Ticks Positioning in 3D plots (FLTK), John W. Eaton, 2011/01/10
Re: Axes Ticks Positioning in 3D plots (FLTK), Michael Goffioul, 2011/01/10
Re: Axes Ticks Positioning in 3D plots (FLTK),
John W. Eaton <=