[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pan-users] ANN: Pan for Windows, Beta 5
From: |
Paul Hudson |
Subject: |
Re: [Pan-users] ANN: Pan for Windows, Beta 5 |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Jan 2003 19:48:36 -0000 |
Mark Derricutt wrote:
> One of the comments on the news.software.readers group is that
> because Pan doesn't have any scoring ability it sucks and is
> useless... not really missed scoring but then not used it in ages so
> I've probably forgotten how usefull it can be....
That's the single biggest reason I won't switch any time soon.
I'm a long time Xnews user. Pan's graphically better in every way, but the
rules/filters suck.
I don't read a lot of groups :-) By which I mean I rely *heavily*on
filtering/killfiles/scoring to spot the stuff to read and the stuff to kill,
and read only a few articles in each group. Of the ones I do read, I
probably read only one or two from most threads - when I know the thread
isn't worth reading, I want to kill it quickly - so I badly miss
"mark-thread-read" (and no, something that's several key strokes or a
shift-select or a shift-drag doesn't come close fo convenience.
P.
Re: [Pan-users] ANN: Pan for Windows, Beta 5, Mark Derricutt, 2003/01/19
- Re: [Pan-users] ANN: Pan for Windows, Beta 5, Mark Derricutt, 2003/01/19
- Re: [Pan-users] ANN: Pan for Windows, Beta 5,
Paul Hudson <=
- Re: [Pan-users] ANN: Pan for Windows, Beta 5, Duncan, 2003/01/20
- Re: [Pan-users] ANN: Pan for Windows, Beta 5, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom, 2003/01/21
Re: [Pan-users] ANN: Pan for Windows, Beta 5, J.B. Moreno, 2003/01/20
Re: [Pan-users] ANN: Pan for Windows, Beta 5, Mark Derricutt, 2003/01/20
Re: [Pan-users] ANN: Pan for Windows, Beta 5, Paul Hudson, 2003/01/21