[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [pdf-devel] List implementation patches
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: [pdf-devel] List implementation patches |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Mar 2008 16:46:51 -0600 |
What I meant is to _phisically_ include gl_list.h and its
dependencies in pdf.h.
That would be ok.
If with "distribute" you mean installing gl_list.h in /usr/local/include/
Indeed, gl_anything.h should not be installed, for a couple reasons --
1) the whole purpose of gnulib is to be shared at the source level, not
to be "installed".
2) gnulib files are shared between many packages; if any given package
installs "their" copy, that will cause conflicts and trouble with
other gnulib-using packages.
To the best of my knowledge, no gnulib headers are ever installed in
$(includedir) by any package, and that's the way it should stay.
Thanks,
karl
- [pdf-devel] List implementation patches, gerel, 2008/03/06
- Re: [pdf-devel] List implementation patches, jemarch, 2008/03/07
- Re: [pdf-devel] List implementation patches, gerel, 2008/03/07
- Re: [pdf-devel] List implementation patches, gerel, 2008/03/07
- Re: [pdf-devel] List implementation patches, jemarch, 2008/03/07
- Re: [pdf-devel] List implementation patches, gerel, 2008/03/07
- Re: [pdf-devel] List implementation patches, jemarch, 2008/03/07
- Re: [pdf-devel] List implementation patches, gerel, 2008/03/07
- Re: [pdf-devel] List implementation patches,
Karl Berry <=
- Re: [pdf-devel] List implementation patches, jemarch, 2008/03/07
- Re: [pdf-devel] List implementation patches, gerel, 2008/03/08
- Re: [pdf-devel] List implementation patches, jemarch, 2008/03/07
- Re: [pdf-devel] List implementation patches, gerel, 2008/03/07
- Re: [pdf-devel] List implementation patches, jemarch, 2008/03/07
- Re: [pdf-devel] List implementation patches, gerel, 2008/03/07
Re: [pdf-devel] List implementation patches, jemarch, 2008/03/07