phpgroupware-developers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Identifying apps stati - Was: Re: [phpGroupWare-developers] Status o


From: Sigurd Nes
Subject: Re: Identifying apps stati - Was: Re: [phpGroupWare-developers] Status of the Debian packaging of phpGroupware
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:11:48 +0100
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080214)

Olivier Berger wrote:
> Le mercredi 20 février 2008 à 00:21 +1100, Dave Hall a écrit :
> 
>> I think that once released 0.9.18 could be packaged a little differently
>> to 0.9.16.  0.9.18 will probably use a new release model, if I ever get
>> time to get infrastructure setup for it.
>>
>> Packages will have one of 4 stati:
>>
>> Core - the core modules which should be installed for all installs
>>
>> Maintained - actively maintained and developed modules, should also be
>> mature
>>
>> Supported - gets security and critical bug fixes - best effort response
>>
>> Orphaned - use at own risk
>>
> 
> Seems very much interesting.
> 
>> There may also be a incubator modules for new modules under development
>>
>> I think we should have 1 deb for the core and separate debs for each of
>> the maintained modules, IMHO including supported modules should be
>> discussed further.
>>
> 
> I'd like to start with such setup from now on if we produce new
> phpgroupware packages, even for 0.9.16.012.
> 
> Would you be able to suggest applications for "Core" and "Maintained" in
> such a setup ?
> 
> Of course, in Core, I would see phpgwapi, setup, admin and preferences.
> 
> For Maintained, the fewer we have, the better (Debian
> packaging-wise ;) ?
> 

For 0.9.18 I would really appreciate to have at least 'addressbook', 
'calendar', 'ged', 'hrm', 'manual', 'projects', 'property' and 'sms' in 
Maintained.

'syncml' might go in core ?

'email' / 'felamimail' ?

Regards

Sigurd




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]