qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] configure flag for compilation question..


From: Martin Bochnig
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] configure flag for compilation question..
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 21:30:55 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS sun4u; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20041221

Ben Taylor wrote:

>---- Ishwar Rattan <address@hidden> wrote: 
>  
>
>>Trying to compile qemu on amd64 based Solaris.
>>
>>I do not have write permission to /usr/local subtree
>>
>>./configure --libdir=other-path --prefix=not-ustlocal
>>is fine
>>but make always generates binaries that want to find
>>/usr/local/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0 etc. (checked with ldd).
>>
>>What is the way out for this sticky point?
>>    
>>
>
>Manually add "-L/usr/local/lib -R/usr/local/lib" 
>

Rather "-L/his/home/sdl_amd64/lib -R/his/home/sdl_amd64/lib"
Because I doubt, an amd64 version of libSDL is currently present in
/usr/local/lib/amd64
(and he doesn't have w access).

This method is btw not really "new" to me, see my posting from a few
hours ago:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=15448&tstart=0


>to the Makefile for the link
>phase so it will correctly add those paths to the library lookup.  If I had
>a code base to look at this instance, I could tell you where.  You could
>also add those flags to Makefile.target in the SOLARIS specific areas,
>which would probably make more sense.
>
>As Martin indicated, setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH may get you a running
>binary, but LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the wrong answer for Solaris.
>
>Ben
>  
>

> "LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the wrong answer for Solaris"
???
--->>  Weak statement.

It has its [dis]advantages.
Namely that the paths to a library are _not_ hardwired.
That's the exactly reason, why I did recommend it in this very scenario.
And I would do it again for Ishwar's current needs.

-M.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]