qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 3/6] Convert error_report() to warn_report()


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 3/6] Convert error_report() to warn_report()
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 14:07:19 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.0

On 07.07.2017 13:58, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 08:33:19AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 07.07.2017 01:49, Alistair Francis wrote:
>>> Convert all uses of error_report("[Ww]arning:"... to use warn_report()
>>> instead. This helps standardise on a single method of printing warnings
>>> to the user.
>>>
>>> All of the warnings were found using this regex expression:
>>>     error_report.*[Ww]arning:
>>> and replaced with:
>>>     warn_report("
>> [...]
>>> diff --git a/tests/test-qdev-global-props.c b/tests/test-qdev-global-props.c
>>> index 48e5b7315f..b25fe892ed 100644
>>> --- a/tests/test-qdev-global-props.c
>>> +++ b/tests/test-qdev-global-props.c
>>> @@ -232,10 +232,10 @@ static void test_dynamic_globalprop(void)
>>>      g_test_trap_assert_passed();
>>>      g_test_trap_assert_stderr_unmatched("*prop1*");
>>>      g_test_trap_assert_stderr_unmatched("*prop2*");
>>> -    g_test_trap_assert_stderr("*Warning: global 
>>> dynamic-prop-type-bad.prop3 has invalid class name\n*");
>>> +    g_test_trap_assert_stderr("*warning: global 
>>> dynamic-prop-type-bad.prop3 has invalid class name\n*");
>>>      g_test_trap_assert_stderr_unmatched("*prop4*");
>>> -    g_test_trap_assert_stderr("*Warning: global nohotplug-type.prop5=105 
>>> not used\n*");
>>> -    g_test_trap_assert_stderr("*Warning: global nondevice-type.prop6 has 
>>> invalid class name\n*");
>>> +    g_test_trap_assert_stderr("*warning: global nohotplug-type.prop5=105 
>>> not used\n*");
>>> +    g_test_trap_assert_stderr("*warning: global nondevice-type.prop6 has 
>>> invalid class name\n*");
>>>      g_test_trap_assert_stdout("");
>>>  }
>>
>> These changes are unrelated ... please drop them from your patch.
> 
> Are they?  I believe they are necessary so the test case won't be
> broken by the qdev-properties.c changes.

Ah, right, of course. I was so much focused on looking at warn_report()
that I did not notice that this hunk here is about adapting the
corresponding *test* ... so never mind - sorry for the noise!

 Thomas




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]