quilt-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Quilt-dev] Tests, temporary file leaks


From: Andreas Gruenbacher
Subject: Re: [Quilt-dev] Tests, temporary file leaks
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 18:42:05 +0100
User-agent: KMail/1.8.2

On Sunday 29 January 2006 16:12, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Quoting myself again:
> > I've also noticed that bash_completion is lagging behind after all the
> > recent changes that were made to several commands. I'll resync it later
> > today.
>
> I've done so, it should be OK now. Note that I am in no way a bash
> completion expert, so others are welcome to review my changes and
> improve them where they can be.

Thanks!

> Note that I did _not_ fully update "import" as there seemed to be some
> disagreement on the recent option renaming from -n to -P. Depending on
> the outcome, we may need to update bash_completion again before the
> release.

I don't see an advantage in using -n instead of -P (and thus reverting the -n 
to -p change). Does anybody think that -P as used in import vs. -P as used in 
other commands would confuse users?

> Another note: "files" currently completes on all patches, whether they
> are applied or not. The help text for the files command doesn't mention
> it, but reading the code makes it clear to me that it works only on
> applied patches by design. Am I correct?

Yes, you are.

> If I am, then we should make the help text clearer about that point,

How?

> and we should also update bash_completion accordingly.

That would be nice.

Thanks,
Andreas.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]