[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Launched! Evaluation time
|
From: |
Zak Rogoff, Free Software Foundation |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Launched! Evaluation time |
|
Date: |
Tue, 20 Oct 2015 15:50:52 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 |
On 10/16/2015 05:34 PM, Zak Rogoff, Free Software Foundation wrote:
> Ok, the criteria are up. Spread the word!
>
> http://www.fsf.org/news/gnu-ethical-repo-criteria
>
> Great job on this everyone, I feel good about it.
>
> Next step is finishing the evaluations.
>
> Could people please sound off on which sites they are evaluating and
> what level of completion the evaluations are? Keep in mind that they
> need to be updated for version 1.0 of the criteria.
>
> Richard also has requested that we have a table on the main page that
> just lists the site's overall grade, and then a separate page that
> breaks it down in more detail. Who's interested in creating that?
>
> Have a great weekend, everyone!
>
Just wanted to say that I think it's fine for the evaluations to be
discussed on this list. If we find there is a conversation that feels
sensitive, for example, speculating about the motive behind the
decisions of people running the repos, then by all means, let's keep it
in private threads.
To more specifically answer your question, Mike, in general, please do
share the evaluations here when they are ready but before posting.
However, in the case of Gitlab, it's probably not necessary because I've
already seen it. Keep me posted on your work with them. It sounds very
promising.
--
Zak Rogoff
Campaigns Manager
Free Software Foundation
GnuPG key fingerprint: 6EB2 B137 347E 6F7C DEDC AFF6 82DE 8D64 B509 0AC8
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature