jami
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ring] Install problem with ubuntu 16.10


From: Stepan Salenikovich
Subject: Re: [Ring] Install problem with ubuntu 16.10
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 14:28:12 -0500 (EST)


----- On Feb 27, 2017, at 11:11 AM, Grégory Blanc address@hidden wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I try to install Ring software on my computer using Ubuntu 16.10 as
> described on page  https://ring.cx/en/download/gnu-linux
> 
> Installation seems to be ok but when I launch program I have the following
> error :
> 
> [libprotobuf FATAL google/protobuf/stubs/common.cc:61] This program
> requires version 3.0.0 of the Protocol Buffer runtime library, but the
> installed version is 2.6.1.  Please update your library.  If you compiled
> the program yourself, make sure that your headers are from the same version
> of Protocol Buffers as your link-time library.  (Version verification
> failed in
> "/build/libphonenumber-ClRhsc/libphonenumber-7.1.0/cpp/src/phonenumbers/
> phonemetadata.pb.cc".)
> terminate called after throwing an instance of
> 'google::protobuf::FatalException'
>  what():  This program requires version 3.0.0 of the Protocol Buffer
> runtime library, but the installed version is 2.6.1.  Please update your
> library.  If you compiled the program yourself, make sure that your headers
> are from the same version of Protocol Buffers as your link-time library.
> (Version verification failed in
> "/build/libphonenumber-ClRhsc/libphonenumber-7.1.0/cpp/src/phonenumbers/
> phonemetadata.pb.cc".)
> /usr/bin/ring.cx : ligne 46 :  6550 Abandon                 (core dumped)
> gnome-ring $*
> 
> 
> Do you have any idea ?

Is your system up to date? I'm on Ubuntu 16.10 and I have libprotobuf 3.0.0.

Seems that the newest version of libebook-contacts (1.2-2) in Ubuntu 16.10
depends on libphonenumber7, which depends on libprotobuf10, which is 3.0.0

So I think a system update should work to fix the issue. If not, then try
explicitly installing libebook-contacts-1.2-2. If that solves it then maybe
we need to update our package dependencies.

> 
> Thanks in advance for your answer,
> 
> Greg



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]