rule-list
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Rule-list] Red Hat No Longer Supports 486


From: Michael Fratoni
Subject: Re: [Rule-list] Red Hat No Longer Supports 486
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 00:42:43 -0500
User-agent: KMail/1.4.3

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Friday 01 November 2002 08:13 pm, Eugene Wong wrote:

> A-a-ah, yes. Eugene hates options & choice! ;^P
>
> Okay, let me rephrase. I want tons of options. I want more than there
> are available now.

Ahh, that makes more sense.

> However, I wish that those options would explain why they are
> advantageous over the others. In other words, I need more info, or
> else, give me a default install that "just works".

That pretty much defines slinky. Little in the way of choices during 
install. You get a default base setup, plus option additional package 
groups.

> Maybe the README or rpm info should mention why the software was
> created in the first place.

I'd agree that it would be useful to include a list of available packages, 
what they do, what they don't and why a user might want to try them.

I hereby nominate Eugene to write the above detailed descriptions. ;)

- -- 
- -Michael

pgp key:  http://www.tuxfan.homeip.net:8080/gpgkey.txt
Red Hat Linux 7.{2,3}|8.0 in 8M of RAM: http://www.rule-project.org/
- --
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9w2XTn/07WoAb/SsRArDcAKC1Ufd/gatZW4HgHXU27JsxwhKUMwCfanOu
Dri252hWptGPKYG0aAogIqg=
=oa7V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]