Re: connection level whitelist/blacklists anyone?

[Chuck Yerkes]

Quoting Cowles, Steve (address@hidden):
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Nigel Horne
> > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 3:36 AM
> > Subject: Re: connection level whitelist/blacklists anyone?
> > On Thursday 13 Mar 2003 5:43 am, Chuck Yerkes wrote:
> > 
> > > Using the access map model:
> > > SPAMASS:127.0.0.1               ALLOW
> > > SPAMASS:127::1                  ALLOW
> > > SPAMASS:192.168                 ALLOW
> > 
> > The patch uploaded to the spamass-milter website has addresses
> > hardcoded, I always wanted to improve it, so maybe I'll give 
> > that an go and upload a new path.
> 
> I'm I following this thread correctly? This seems like just the type of
> spamass-milter enhancement I've been looking for.

No, I never proposed changing milter behaviour based on a destination.
Ok, I did, but for users/domains and that was the part 2 of this message
which you have elided.


Given that the milter runs before all the magic of your cf
file happens, before the alias expansions happen (AFAIK),
you're not entirely sure where that mail might be heading.

Does milter have hooks to be called after ruleset 3 exits?
Can it give that final triplet information?
Not sure.  Will look.