[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Wesnoth-dev] balancing changes
From: |
John McNabb |
Subject: |
Re: [Wesnoth-dev] balancing changes |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Apr 2005 14:52:58 -0400 (EDT) |
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, Alex Turner wrote:
> While I think the change in Guardsmen line (re:traits) is good; what's
> the rationale for removing them as leaders? Is it simply that they can
> take too much damage? I've been playing allot more, and had enjoyed both
> using them, and fighting against them as Leader units.
>
> I'm heading to try and find the IRC log, I guess :-)
>
> -Alex Turner
Below is the relevant excerpt interspersed with the other discussion on
rebalancing the guardsman. If people want to hold back on this change,
then only multiplayer.cfg needs to be reverted.
(16:10:17) sanna: Sirp: Well, actually I am only really bothered by
steadfast in an enemy unit, if it is the leader that has it
(16:10:17) ott: Sirp: since they already have steadfast ability, which is
a bit
like having a trait, they could have only one extra -- agreed also
(16:10:21) Sirp: what about an alternative of making the guardsman slow in
most
terrain?
(16:10:25) Ayin: Maybe units should only get 1, and sometimes, when the
player is lucky, 2 traits
(16:10:43) ott: Ayin: Now that is really stirring the pot. :-)
(16:10:53) Dragonking: Sirp: I'm afrait problem with guard is that it
can't be too quick, and too slow :)
(16:11:14) Shade: Has anybody seen any decent proposals for a) More racial
traits, b) more general traits (The goal would be to dillute the pool of
possible traits- but no 'forced fits')
(16:11:36) DarthFool: sirp: the problem is with only 4mv, a 2 in terrain
mv = really slow.
(16:11:40) Dragonking: Shade: I really don't like idea of "buing traits"
(16:12:04) Shade: Dragonking: Not buy them-
(16:12:17) Dragonking: Shade: I missread you :-/
(16:12:26) DarthFool: shade: I like the idea of having random number of
traits,
0,1, or 2
(16:12:45) DarthFool: shade: most units should be traitless...
(16:12:50) Shade: DarthFool: Or what you said
(16:12:52) Shade: :)
(16:12:58) Sirp: I don't like the idea of a random number of traits.
(16:13:09) Sirp: traits can already add too much luck to the game
(16:13:15) ott: Sirp: I agree, that really makes things too random
(16:13:25) Shade: In some ways you could make a case that 'Quick is the
new Loyal"
(16:13:26) Ayin: Mhhhh... Or else, we should introduce anti-traits, like
weak, stupid, slow, etc *grin*
(16:13:29) Dragonking: I don't like idea of random no of traits too - look
- traits are main power of unit without special ability
(16:13:31) Sirp: it'll really feel unfair if your units have no traits and
your
enemies have 2
(16:13:39) Ayin: (just kidding of course :P)
(16:13:40) Dragonking: exacly
(16:13:47) ott: Dragonking: What are the most unbalanced steadfast trait
combos? quick/resilient?
(16:13:49) sanna: Sirp: So I would like to remove the Dwarvish Stalwart
from the leader options...
(16:13:58) Sirp: sanna, that's fine with me.
(16:14:03) Dragonking: ott: yes
(16:14:08) ott: sanna: That sounds sensible.
(16:14:30) sanna: Sirp: Not that solves anything about the Guardsman
*grin*
(16:14:38) DarthFool: how about make guardsmen have only 1 trait. leave
quick in.
(16:15:03) DarthFool: than only 1/4 of guardsmen get quick.
(16:15:08) Dragonking: DarthFool: strog/quick guard is hell too
(16:15:29) DarthFool: dk: with only 1 trait there would be no
strong/quick either.
(16:15:31) sanna: DarthFool: Sort of in reality make steadfast a unit
specific,
always applied trait then?
(16:15:49) DarthFool: sanna: essentially yes.
(16:16:00) Dragonking: and not cause of "strong" trait, but cause he can
keep terrian and then ulf will come and wipe enemy out - then guard
protect ulf and we
have circle...
(16:16:34) Dragonking: I mean problem with guard is: IF quick - then
dwarwes got terrian what they wnt
(16:16:39) Dragonking: want'
(16:17:17) DarthFool: DK: how many quick guards does it take to be
dangerous? 1? 2? 4?
(16:17:34) Dragonking: 2
(16:18:01) Sirp: yeah I kind of like DarthFool's idea: reduce guardsman's
traits to 1....then quick isn't that likely and if they are quick, they
aren't strong
or resilient.
(16:18:02) Dragonking: and possibility to got 2 is VERY high
(16:18:42) Dragonking: Sirp: I think we can try this - it will reduce
chance to
got quick a lot
(16:19:12) Sirp: yes, if you recruit 2 guardsmen now, there's a 1/4 chance
both
will be quick....after that change, only a 1/16 chance.
(16:20:02) Dragonking: cause what is most dangerous at MP - quick guard
and behind him strong/reilirnt ulf
(16:20:10) sanna: Sirp: That is a change I can very well live with *smile*
(16:21:25) Dragonking: Sirp: so I think all here agree with 1 trait idea
:)
(16:22:14) Sirp: now I believe we just need a code change to allow number
of traits to be set per-unit-type
(16:22:41) Dragonking: Sirp: and one thing more, just now not about
dwarwes but
about drakes...
(16:22:47) Sirp: btw should we also reduce the power of the elvish ranger
a little?
(16:22:50) sanna: Sirp: And removing steadfast leaders? Are we in
agreement about that too?
(16:22:55) Sirp: sanna, yes.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
"In theory, theory and practice are the same,
but in practice they're different."
-------------------------------------------------------------------
John W. C. McNabb
-------------------------------------------------------------------