[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: beamer.el update candidate
From: |
Ikumi Keita |
Subject: |
Re: beamer.el update candidate |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Dec 2022 19:06:28 +0900 |
Hi Arash,
>>>>> Arash Esbati <arash@gnu.org> writes:
> Thanks for working on this. I'm not a beamer user so I don't have any
> comment on the functionality (and I'm pretty sure it works fine), my
> only "request for more work" is if you also want to improve the
> fontification support for the provided macros. I think it will be
> plenty of work to implement all those overlay arguments, but we can
> gradually work on things like:
> (font-latex-add-keywords '(("item" "<[<"))
> 'textual)
> (font-latex-add-keywords '(("textbf" "<{"))
> 'bold-command)
Thanks, I'll see what I can do.
(What I feel uneasy a bit is that AUCTeX framework to insert font macros
isn't capable of overlay arguments. :-( )
Regards,
Ikumi Keita
#StandWithUkraine #StopWarInUkraine
- Re: beamer.el update candidate, (continued)
- Re: beamer.el update candidate, Uwe Brauer, 2022/12/09
- Re: beamer.el update candidate, Ikumi Keita, 2022/12/10
- Re: beamer.el update candidate, Uwe Brauer, 2022/12/11
- Re: beamer.el update candidate, Ikumi Keita, 2022/12/12
- Re: beamer.el update candidate, Uwe Brauer, 2022/12/12
Re: beamer.el update candidate, Arash Esbati, 2022/12/06
- Re: beamer.el update candidate,
Ikumi Keita <=