[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[AUCTeX] Re: New commands to activate AUCTeX?
From: |
Michael Forster |
Subject: |
[AUCTeX] Re: New commands to activate AUCTeX? |
Date: |
Sat, 21 May 2005 13:15:10 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) |
Hi,
David Kastrup wrote:
Michael Forster <address@hidden> writes:
The texmf finding problem with MiKTeX remains, right?
How about something like
TEX=`kpsewhich tex.exe`
TEXMF=${TEX%/miktex/bin/tex.exe}
Is the general package layout of MikTeX that? texmf tree, then
miktex/bin? Always?
Well, I am not an MikTeX expert, but I've never run across an
installation with a different layout, and I've been using MikTeX for
some years. Using the MikTeX installer, one can choose where to put the
texmf tree(s), but the executables seem always to be in $TEXMF/miktex/bin.
And miktex/bin all in lowercase letters? We wont use kpsewhich here,
> but this might provide a way to figure out the texmf tree.
I think it's always in lowercase. At least this is how the current
installer does it. You could get around the uppercase/lowercase issue by
just starting at the tex.exe directory and moving up two levels in the path.
Note that "kpsewhich" has the advantage that it returns the C: syntax,
while "which" returns "/cygdrive/c/" syntax. This is because cygwin
converts "C:" path entries to "/cygdrive/c" (*)
> And the texmf tree then is called something that ends in texmf as
> last path component?
No. This can be choosen by the user.
Maybe a safe algorithm is:
* Start with the directory of tex.exe. Convert the name to lowercase and
assert that it is "bin"
* Move one directory up. Convert the name to lowercase and assert that
it is "miktex"
* Move one directory up. Use this as the texmf directory. Optionally
assert that it has a "tex" subdirectory.
Mike
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(*) BTW: Do you now the cygpath utility which comes with cygwin? Could
be helpful:
$ cygpath -d C:\\Program\ Files
C:\PROGRA~1
$ cygpath -m C:\\Program\ Files
C:/Program Files
$ cygpath -u C:\\Program\ Files
/cygdrive/c/Program Files
$ cygpath -w /cygdrive/c/Progra~1
c:\Progra~1
$ cygpath -w --long C:/Progra~1
C:\Program Files
Usage: cygpath (-d|-m|-u|-w|-t TYPE) [-f FILE] [OPTION]... NAME...
cygpath [-c HANDLE]
cygpath [-ADHPSW]
Convert Unix and Windows format paths, or output system path information
Output type options:
-d, --dos print DOS (short) form of NAMEs (C:\PROGRA~1\)
-m, --mixed like --windows, but with regular slashes
(C:/WINNT)
-M, --mode report on mode of file (binmode or textmode)
-u, --unix (default) print Unix form of NAMEs
(/cygdrive/c/winnt)
-w, --windows print Windows form of NAMEs (C:\WINNT)
-t, --type TYPE print TYPE form: 'dos', 'mixed', 'unix', or
'windows'
Path conversion options:
-a, --absolute output absolute path
-l, --long-name print Windows long form of NAMEs (with -w, -m
only)
-p, --path NAME is a PATH list (i.e., '/bin:/usr/bin')
-s, --short-name print DOS (short) form of NAMEs (with -w, -m
only)
System information:
-A, --allusers use `All Users' instead of current user for -D,
-P
-D, --desktop output `Desktop' directory and exit
-H, --homeroot output `Profiles' directory (home root) and exit
-P, --smprograms output Start Menu `Programs' directory and exit
-S, --sysdir output system directory and exit
-W, --windir output `Windows' directory and exit
Other options:
-f, --file FILE read FILE for input; use - to read from STDIN
-o, --option read options from FILE as well (for use with
--file)
-c, --close HANDLE close HANDLE (for use in captured process)
-i, --ignore ignore missing argument
-h, --help output usage information and exit
-v, --version output version information and exit
- [AUCTeX] New commands to activate AUCTeX?, Uwe Siart, 2005/05/20
- Re: [AUCTeX] New commands to activate AUCTeX?, David Kastrup, 2005/05/20
- Re: [AUCTeX] New commands to activate AUCTeX?, Uwe Siart, 2005/05/20
- Re: [AUCTeX] New commands to activate AUCTeX?, David Kastrup, 2005/05/20
- Re: [AUCTeX] New commands to activate AUCTeX?, Uwe Siart, 2005/05/20
- Re: [AUCTeX] New commands to activate AUCTeX?, David Kastrup, 2005/05/20
- [AUCTeX] Re: New commands to activate AUCTeX?, Michael Forster, 2005/05/20
- Re: [AUCTeX] Re: New commands to activate AUCTeX?, David Kastrup, 2005/05/20
- [AUCTeX] Re: New commands to activate AUCTeX?,
Michael Forster <=
- Re: [AUCTeX] Re: New commands to activate AUCTeX?, Ralf Angeli, 2005/05/21