[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [OT] Guido Draheim vs. Peter Simons (Correction!)

From: Peter Simons
Subject: Re: [OT] Guido Draheim vs. Peter Simons (Correction!)
Date: 19 Jan 2003 01:59:12 +0100

I quoted, among others, the following CVS IDs:

 >     $Id: ac_config_libconfig_in.m4,v 1.2 2002/04/19 12:03:00 simons Exp $
 >     $Id: ac_config_libconfig_in.m4,v 1.4 2002/09/12 22:11:52 guidod Exp $

 >     $Id: ac_config_pkgconfig_in.m4,v 1.2 2002/05/06 11:47:30 simons Exp $
 >     $Id: ac_config_pkgconfig_in.m4,v 1.2 2002/09/12 22:11:38 guidod Exp $

 >     $Id: ac_path_lib.m4,v 1.2 2002/04/19 12:03:00 simons Exp $
 >     $Id: ac_path_lib.m4,v 1.3 2002/09/12 22:11:14 guidod Exp $

and upon inspection of the dates concluded:

 > Looks like my archive had _all_ of them before yours did.
 > Conclusion: None of the commits in group (2) were added to your
 > site before they were available on mine.

Unfortunately, the idea to check the older commits came to me only
after I had sent my mail already. Now I did check them, and it turned
out that you committed the new versions (of all of them) on
2002-03-23, and re-committed them when I performed the update.

So, to be fair, I must correct my statement:

 > To summarize: There is ONE CASE where the SourceForge "branch" of
 > the macro archive was more up-to-date than the GNU archive.

In fact, there are two cases (or four, depending on how you count it),
in which your site was more up-to-date. 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]