[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: conversion to git
From: |
Bob Friesenhahn |
Subject: |
Re: conversion to git |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:12:01 -0500 (CDT) |
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, Eric Blake wrote:
Eric Blake <ebb9 <at> byu.net> writes:
I'm hoping to convert the Autoconf repository to git (while still providing a
CVS read-only mirror)
The initial git import is complete. Feel free to check it out:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=autoconf.git
What is the purpose of converting to git? Is this a political
statement (e.g. "Linux GNU" vs "GNU Linux") or is there a concrete
purpose? What is the cost vs benefit of the conversion? Who
participated in the decision to make this conversion?
Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
- conversion to git, Eric Blake, 2007/09/14
- Re: conversion to git, Andreas Schwab, 2007/09/14
- Re: conversion to git, Benoit SIGOURE, 2007/09/14
- Re: conversion to git, Eric Blake, 2007/09/19
- Re: conversion to git,
Bob Friesenhahn <=
- Re: conversion to git, Eric Blake, 2007/09/19
- Re: conversion to git, Bob Friesenhahn, 2007/09/19
- Re: conversion to git, Bob Proulx, 2007/09/19
- Re: conversion to git, Russ Allbery, 2007/09/19
- Re: conversion to git, Bob Friesenhahn, 2007/09/19
- Re: conversion to git, Russ Allbery, 2007/09/20
- Re: conversion to git, Paul Smith, 2007/09/20
- Re: conversion to git, Warren Young, 2007/09/20
- Re: conversion to git, Paul Smith, 2007/09/20
- Re: conversion to git, Ralf Corsepius, 2007/09/20