[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: failed tests AC_CHECK_LIB
From: |
Keith Marshall |
Subject: |
Re: failed tests AC_CHECK_LIB |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Sep 2008 23:03:22 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
On Saturday 20 September 2008 22:40:56 Matej Tyc wrote:
> > Then you need to use a macro that allows for specifying a header
> > to include. You can write one yourself, or try AC_CHECK_FUNC_IN
> > from the autoconf macro archive.
>
> By the way, do you have an idea what's the cause of this failiure?
Yes. It is because the function you are trying to check for uses the
__stdcall convention, and you can't resolve links to such functions,
without including the proper headers, so the compiler knows that.
AC_CHECK_LIB or AC_SEARCH_LIBS are only useful for functions which
use the __cdecl calling convention.
Regards,
Keith.
- failed tests AC_CHECK_LIB, Matej Tyc, 2008/09/20
- Re: failed tests AC_CHECK_LIB, Brian Dessent, 2008/09/20
- Re: failed tests AC_CHECK_LIB, Matej Tyc, 2008/09/20
- Re: failed tests AC_CHECK_LIB,
Keith Marshall <=
- Re: failed tests AC_CHECK_LIB, Brian Dessent, 2008/09/20
- Re: failed tests AC_CHECK_LIB, Matěj Týč, 2008/09/21
- Re: failed tests AC_CHECK_LIB, Brian Dessent, 2008/09/21
- Re: failed tests AC_CHECK_LIB, Keith Marshall, 2008/09/21
- Re: failed tests AC_CHECK_LIB, Thomas Dickey, 2008/09/21