[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: request for configure clarifications on darwin10
From: |
Jack Howarth |
Subject: |
Re: request for configure clarifications on darwin10 |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:42:14 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 04:26:36PM -0700, Toby Peterson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 16:20, Jack Howarth <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Only booting the 64-bit kernel returns
> > coherency to the situation with uname and arch reporting x86_64.
>
> This is not true. Jack, I've corrected you on this several times now.
> The only thing that changes on K64 is "uname -m", which config.guess
> does not use. The output of "arch" and "uname -p" is i386 regardless.
>
> - Toby
Toby,
Okay. I mispoke on that issue but it is orthogonal to the solution.
On Darwin10, under the 32-bit kernel (which is the default), both
uname -p and uname -m reports i386 so a patch is necessary to return
coherency between the detected host and the actual target code
generated by the system compiler.
Jack
Re: request for configure clarifications on darwin10, Bob Friesenhahn, 2009/09/16
Re: request for configure clarifications on darwin10, Steffen Dettmer, 2009/09/16