[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [avr-gcc-list] [VOTE] objdump patch

From: E. Weddington
Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] [VOTE] objdump patch
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 10:03:30 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803)

Svein E. Seldal wrote:


It seems like there are several preferences on how the new objdump with symbols output should look like.

To make a decision more fair (and to do a little experiment), I will now arrange a vote on the syntax of the objdump patch. Here are the choices:

A) The old format (as it is today):

20c:       02 c0           rjmp    .+4         ; 0x212

B) New syntax which is easier and faster to read

20c:       02 c0           rjmp    0x212 <.do_copy_data_start>     ; .+4

C) Similar to B) only without excessive comment. My vote.

20c:       02 c0           rjmp    0x212 <.do_copy_data_start>

D) Similar to the old format. The symbol is located in the comment

20c:       02 c0           rjmp    .+4    ; 0x212 <.do_copy_data_start>

I vote for either B or C. Personally I don't care whether there is an excessive comment or not.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]