[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!
|
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
|
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?! |
|
Date: |
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 07:56:49 +0200 (MET DST) |
Russell Shaw <address@hidden> wrote:
> The only fix that is needed is to state prominantly in the first few
> few paragraphs what the difference is, and all confusion will
> disappear.
Nope, I rather did what we (avr-libc-dev) agreed quite some time ago:
deprectated INTERRUPT completely, and removed it from all the
remaining documentation.
--
cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
- [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!, Vincent Trouilliez, 2005/09/03
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!, User Tomdean, 2005/09/03
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!, User Tomdean, 2005/09/03
- Message not available
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/09/03
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!, Russell Shaw, 2005/09/03
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!,
Joerg Wunsch <=
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!, Royce Pereira, 2005/09/04
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/09/04
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!, Russell Shaw, 2005/09/04
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!, Vincent Trouilliez, 2005/09/04
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/09/04
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!, Royce Pereira, 2005/09/04
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/09/04
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!, Royce Pereira, 2005/09/04
Re: [avr-gcc-list] SIGNAL or INTERRUPT ?!, Royce Pereira, 2005/09/04