[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] After ATMega
From: |
Galen Seitz |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] After ATMega |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Oct 2005 08:44:18 -0700 |
Eric Pasquier <address@hidden> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I am using an ATMega32, 16MHz to implement a Kalman filter (7 input states).
> I suceed to run it at 60Hz, but with lots of optimization and
> compromises, like using fix floating point math for example.
> ADC, timers, serial, I/O are used.
>
> I would like to have more capacity for calculation (about 6 times),
> but I need to stay at almost the same frequency for Timers (PPM read
> and Servos commands).
>
> What new MCU can I use ?
>
> - Atmel have AT91SAM7 series: about 50Mips (only 3 times)
> - others ?
The AT91SAM7 parts are 32 bits, so I believe you would see more than three
times improvement. That said, I think a DSP part might be a better choice,
given what you are implementing. I'd look at the TI TMS320F2801.
galen
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] 32-bits time, (continued)
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] 32-bits time, Dmitry K., 2005/10/12
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] 32-bits time, Loveny Design, 2005/10/12
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] 32-bits time, David Kelly, 2005/10/12
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] 32-bits time, Gavin Jackson, 2005/10/12
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] 32-bits time, Eric Pasquier, 2005/10/12
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] 32-bits time, Galen Seitz, 2005/10/12
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] 32-bits time, Eric Pasquier, 2005/10/13
- [avr-gcc-list] After ATMega, Eric Pasquier, 2005/10/13
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] After ATMega,
Galen Seitz <=
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] After ATMega, Patrick Blanchard, 2005/10/13
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] After ATMega, Trampas, 2005/10/13
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] After ATMega, Patrick Blanchard, 2005/10/13
Re: [avr-gcc-list] 32-bits time, Dmitry K., 2005/10/13
RE: [avr-gcc-list] 32-bits time, Loveny Design, 2005/10/13