[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fw: Kill warnings

From: Akim Demaille
Subject: Re: Fw: Kill warnings
Date: 30 Nov 2001 16:09:52 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Civil Service)

>>>>> "Pascal" == Pascal Bart <address@hidden> writes:

Pascal>  Hi Akim,
>> There have been so many complaints about compilers that seem to be
>> much more picky than GCC, or more exactly, than my ability to check
>> GCC doesn't complain at all, that using -Werror seems the best
>> solutions to me.
Pascal>  Well, I don't really understand you interest for -Werror,
Pascal> IMHO this is not a good idea to use it, a lot of warnings
Pascal> comes from external source code, and any warnings are
Pascal> debatables.  

Right, but what's it got to do with it?  I'm referring to compiling
Bison and the test suite.

Pascal> And I cann't remember complains from users, about any
Pascal> unsolvable errors.

Maybe your memory is too short: you were in the set of people
complaining about signed < unsigned :) :) :)

I agree it is debatable.  What is not, is our peace, is our not having
to answer reports about warnings in the code produced by Bison.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]