[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: push parser implemenation
From: |
Bob Rossi |
Subject: |
Re: push parser implemenation |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Sep 2006 15:46:17 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 12:44:00PM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Bob Rossi <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Honestly, I don't understand why a pull parser needs this feature.
>
> If nobody knows why it'd be useful then let's just omit it for now.
> All we need to do is document the fact that the combination of
> features is not supported. Someone who actually needs the feature
> will be a better judge of how it should be implemented.
OK, thank you. I'm going to incorporate all the changes we've discussed
so far and post a patch to this list.
Thanks,
Bob Rossi
- Re: push parser implemenation, (continued)
- Re: push parser implemenation, Akim Demaille, 2006/09/14
- Re: push parser implemenation, Bob Rossi, 2006/09/14
- Re: push parser implemenation, Akim Demaille, 2006/09/14
- Re: push parser implemenation, Bob Rossi, 2006/09/14
- Re: push parser implemenation, Akim Demaille, 2006/09/14
- Re: push parser implemenation, Bob Rossi, 2006/09/14
- Re: push parser implemenation, Paul Eggert, 2006/09/14
- Re: push parser implemenation, Bob Rossi, 2006/09/14
- Re: push parser implemenation, Paul Eggert, 2006/09/14
- Re: push parser implemenation,
Bob Rossi <=
- Re: push parser implemenation, Bob Rossi, 2006/09/14
- Re: push parser implemenation, Paul Eggert, 2006/09/14
- Re: push parser implemenation, Bob Rossi, 2006/09/15
- Re: push parser implemenation, Paul Eggert, 2006/09/15
- Re: push parser implemenation, Bob Rossi, 2006/09/15
- Re: push parser implemenation, Bob Rossi, 2006/09/16
- Re: push parser implemenation, Akim Demaille, 2006/09/15
- Re: push parser implemenation, Bob Rossi, 2006/09/15
- Re: push parser implemenation, Akim Demaille, 2006/09/15