[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?
From: |
gregrwm |
Subject: |
Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only? |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Dec 2012 12:01:44 -0600 |
>> > echo !(??|foo|bar)
>>
>> precisely where i started this thread, !(??)
>
> +(??) and !(??) are completely different things. !(??) was never
mentioned in the original question, and should work as expected.
yow, truly, you're saying +(??) selects *any multiple* of 2chars, but !(??)
excludes 2char names *only*! sheesh. ok thanks.
- shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, gregrwm, 2012/12/13
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, Dan Douglas, 2012/12/13
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, DJ Mills, 2012/12/13
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, Dan Douglas, 2012/12/13
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, gregrwm, 2012/12/14
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, Rene Herman, 2012/12/14
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, gregrwm, 2012/12/14
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, Rene Herman, 2012/12/14
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, DJ Mills, 2012/12/14
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?,
gregrwm <=
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, DJ Mills, 2012/12/15
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, gregrwm, 2012/12/16
Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, Rene Herman, 2012/12/13