[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?
|
From: |
gregrwm |
|
Subject: |
Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only? |
|
Date: |
Sun, 16 Dec 2012 05:58:26 -0600 |
> @(foo)
> !()
> ..sounds like what you're looking for to me.
ty! @ had escaped my notice, and seems indeed what i wanted, craft a
selection of files eg /@(?|??|??.*|los*|ne*), and then move the inverse
selection /!(?|??|??.*|los*|ne*). thanks again.
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, (continued)
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, Dan Douglas, 2012/12/13
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, DJ Mills, 2012/12/13
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, Dan Douglas, 2012/12/13
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, gregrwm, 2012/12/14
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, Rene Herman, 2012/12/14
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, gregrwm, 2012/12/14
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, Rene Herman, 2012/12/14
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, DJ Mills, 2012/12/14
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, gregrwm, 2012/12/15
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, DJ Mills, 2012/12/15
- Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?,
gregrwm <=
Re: shouldn't /+(??) capture 2 letter files only?, Rene Herman, 2012/12/13