Re: coreutils-6.5: yet another C89 problem

[Bob Proulx]

Paul Eggert wrote:
> Matthew Woehlke <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > I could probably do it on
> > this box, but since it's Linux, it would still be with gcc.
> 
> Even that would be helpful, since our current buildbot doesn't do the
> particular combination of GCC options you're interested in.

I would be happy to add a special-options-build to the buildbot to
check for c89 compatibility.  I will patch in the c99-to-c89.diff
first of course.  What options would be required for this?  Is
"-Wdeclaration-after-statement -Werror" sufficient?

Bob