[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Function palyer plugin parser
From: |
Hideki IWAMOTO |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Function palyer plugin parser |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Feb 2010 01:12:07 +0900 |
Hi.
> > When the parser is supporting references and other symbols
> > and they are not included in the source code,
> > makeing empty GRTAGS and GSYMS is necessary for incremental updating.
> > The user may add references to the source code later.
Currently, opening multiple tag files with different mode at the same time
(e.g. opening GRTAGS with GTAGS_CREATE while GTAGS is opened with GTAGS_MODIFY)
is not allowed.
If this restriction is removed, it becomes possible to make GRTAGS and GSYMS
in incremental updating, and this problem will be solved.
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:59:23 +0900, Shigio YAMAGUCHI wrote...
> > > 2. How about not making empty GRTAGS and GSYMS?
> >
> > There is a case where this causes a problem.
> >
> > When the parser is supporting references and other symbols
> > and they are not included in the source code,
> > makeing empty GRTAGS and GSYMS is necessary for incremental updating.
> > The user may add references to the source code later.
>
> OK.
> It is reasonable. I withdraw my suggestion.
> --
> Shigio YAMAGUCHI <address@hidden>
> PGP fingerprint: D1CB 0B89 B346 4AB6 5663 C4B6 3CA5 BBB3 57BE DDA3
----
Hideki IWAMOTO address@hidden
- Re: cost of popen(), Hideki IWAMOTO, 2010/02/13
- Re: cost of popen(), Shigio YAMAGUCHI, 2010/02/13
- Re: cost of popen(), Hideki IWAMOTO, 2010/02/13
- Re: cost of popen(), Shigio YAMAGUCHI, 2010/02/14
- [PATCH] Function palyer plugin parser, Hideki IWAMOTO, 2010/02/15
- Re: [PATCH] Function palyer plugin parser, Shigio YAMAGUCHI, 2010/02/15
- Re: [PATCH] Function palyer plugin parser, Hideki IWAMOTO, 2010/02/16
- Re: [PATCH] Function palyer plugin parser, Shigio YAMAGUCHI, 2010/02/17
- Re: [PATCH] Function palyer plugin parser, Hideki IWAMOTO, 2010/02/17
- Re: [PATCH] Function palyer plugin parser, Shigio YAMAGUCHI, 2010/02/17
- Re: [PATCH] Function palyer plugin parser,
Hideki IWAMOTO <=
- New rule (Re: [PATCH] Function palyer plugin parser), Shigio YAMAGUCHI, 2010/02/17
- Re: New rule (Re: [PATCH] Function palyer plugin parser), Hideki IWAMOTO, 2010/02/20
- Re: New rule (Re: [PATCH] Function palyer plugin parser), Shigio YAMAGUCHI, 2010/02/20
- Re: New rule (Re: [PATCH] Function palyer plugin parser), Hideki IWAMOTO, 2010/02/25
- Re: New rule (Re: [PATCH] Function palyer plugin parser), Shigio YAMAGUCHI, 2010/02/25
- Removing messages which confuse the user (Re: [PATCH] Function palyer plugin parser), Shigio YAMAGUCHI, 2010/02/18
- Re: Removing messages which confuse the user (Re: [PATCH] Function palyer plugin parser), Hideki IWAMOTO, 2010/02/19
- Re: Removing messages which confuse the user (Re: [PATCH] Function palyer plugin parser), Shigio YAMAGUCHI, 2010/02/19
- Re: Removing messages which confuse the user (Re: [PATCH] Function palyer plugin parser), Hideki IWAMOTO, 2010/02/19
- Re: Removing messages which confuse the user (Re: [PATCH] Function palyer plugin parser), Shigio YAMAGUCHI, 2010/02/20