[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#9528: 24.0.50; Info navigation

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: bug#9528: 24.0.50; Info navigation
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 19:03:48 +0300

> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Cc: Dani Moncayo <address@hidden>,  address@hidden
> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:24:12 -0400
> FWIW, I'm with Dani on this one: maybe jumping back to the intermediate
> "Functions" node makes sense for deep reasons, but there are good
> superficial reasons to ignore this internal node for `l'.

Then we will have to disagree.

But I beg you to please leave the traditional operation of `l' alone.
If we want to cater to users who are confused by that, let's have a
separate command.  We can bind it to something users nowadays expect,
like M-<left>, and also to the "go back in history" button on the tool
bar.  Just let's not change what `l' does, as long as the stand-alone
reader works like that.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]