[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*
From: |
Michael Heerdegen |
Subject: |
bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let* |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Sep 2017 14:13:26 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Mark Oteiza <mvoteiza@udel.edu> writes:
> This is a patch implementing the above: if-let and when-let only take
> single tuple, while {if,when,and}-let* lose the single tuple special
> case.
I wonder if we should mark if-let and when-let obsolete instead.
Because it is only a special case of the if-let* and when-let* forms
(with only one binding), so it is absolutely redundant. Also, I find
the new syntax breaking with the binding-list syntax of let confusing.
Finally, it would ease the transition for programmers: the modified
if-let and when-let break existing code, and it's not obviously for
programmers what's suddenly wrong.
Michael.
- bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*, (continued)
- bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*, Mark Oteiza, 2017/09/12
- bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/09/12
- bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*, Mark Oteiza, 2017/09/12
- bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/09/13
- bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*, Mark Oteiza, 2017/09/13
- bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/09/13
- bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*, Mark Oteiza, 2017/09/13
- bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/09/13
- bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*, Mark Oteiza, 2017/09/13
- bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/09/13
- bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*,
Michael Heerdegen <=
- bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*, Mark Oteiza, 2017/09/12